Search results

I found another site that has that picture also :-) And yes, I am lame. At least I admit it!

You might have an older Q6600 that doesn't overclock too well. Download CPU-Z and see if the revision is "G0"... if it is, then you should be able to go higher. I loved the P5N-E board... it was one of the few "budget" offerings I've come across that have been so superb for overclocking...

From our front-page news: We posted first about Adobe Photoshop's online counter-part just over a year ago, and finally, it's now here. Though still considered a beta, it's feature-rich and can help you get your basic tasks done. The only thing you need to bear in mind when checking it out is...

That's something I would take into consideration. Some games, as far as I know, force DX10 mode while in Vista, but I could be wrong. I know whenever I launch Crysis, the window notes DX10, and I don't see an option to force DX9 mode. I know both Lost Planet and Call of Juarez allow you to...

Tu shay Mr. Kougar... tu shay. Let's hope I was wrong and that it goes down even faster than what I claimed.

Network storage if growing more popular each day, and thanks to that, there are countless NAS boxes to choose from. We take our first look at a QNAP offering, that proves you do get what you pay for. This single-bay NAS offers pure silence, a great feature-set and simple setup. You can read...

Yes, that RAM should work no problem. FB-DIMM is FB-DIMM... Apple's is no different.

OCZ's smartest decision was to move into other areas, because memory can only go so far. Their PSU's have done well, and as far as I know, so have their accessories and CPU coolers. They have some extremely smart people there, so I don't think they will often release anything that completely...

/me is some glad he's on no ones bad side here!

I think there is an overall FPS decrease in Vista (well, I know this), but I don't think it's major, but rather something like 5%. If I can find time, I'd like to follow-up our old "Vista vs. XP" with our current fleet of games and on identical hardware (both ATI and NVIDIA) and then get some...

Saw about that security hole... that's nuts. There were a few holes in the initial Windows release also, when it was launched last summer. I am SO drawn into Firefox that I don't think I could just drop it that easily. I've been using it since before it was ever called Firefox... and no other...

You said it brother! Just a note, I received the monitor on Tuesday and haven't regretted my decision, that's for sure. I received a slightly newer revision, although I'm not sure what the differences are. However, one thing I will mention is that this display does have some...

I think the novelty of this thing would increase the price drastically... it seems to be that it's more of a concept than anything. I'm really interested to see if this goes anywhere. If it does, then cool. It will keep things interesting, and make our GPU purchasing decisions evermore difficult!

I haven't read the reviews myself, but I think I pretty much saw what I needed to. I am a firm believer that to see the most from triple-SLI or Quad-SLI... you need a 2560x1600 monitor. Considering that even at 2560x1600, the performance is good all around, most people run 1920x1200... and...

No idea... but inc. Vat, £255 would be over $500 USD. I wonder if that's accurate, or if it's just more expensive at that particular e-tailer?

I have no doubts we'll see Octal-Cores by year end, but I'm sure they will be based on the current-gen Penryn instead of the new Nehalem. I don't think we'll see an Octal-Core offering of that until Spring 2009. Am I wrong, or lame in saying this thread has gone hardcore? :-(

Oh there is no question. You could get 8GB of DDR2 for cheaper than 2GB of DDR3... it's a no-brainer as far as I am concerned. If you were looking for the absolute best performance, then DDR3 would make sense, but it's still a huge premium.

Can you take a picture of this? I don't understand how Windows itself would defrag on boot. Unless you have some third-party application installed that would enable this, I still think it's a CHKDSK. Regardless, it still sounds overclocking related.

If that's the case, you WILL notice a rather significant difference (I hope). I don't see a huge difference between a new 7200.10 and 7200.11, except for those light copies that I mentioned.

That is today... we are not in the future yet ;-)