i was only asking you to compare them because maybe there are people out there who would like to know which one is worth the money xbitlabs.com once did a review with the e6850 vs q6600 g0 so i thought maybe you would like to be first to do my test since you have the resources(e8400) and i dont. you should do the review because maybe people would like a cpu that consumes less energy and runs cooler while being close to performance of a quad if not better in some areas
Yes, I realize, but the fact of the matter is, that's an odd comparison. I mentioned that the E8400 is able to overclock far enough to beat a Q6600 at stock speed, so obviously, a Q6600 that's overclocked will beat the E8400.
Simple math comes into play:
Q6600 = 2.4GHz * 4 = 9.6GHz
E8400 = 4.2GHz * 2 = 8.4GHz
And a Q6600 that's overclocked to 3.6GHz would be 14.4GHz total. So, for top-end speed, yes the Q6600 would kick the E8400's ass, but that still requires some heavy overclocking.
In the end, I'd purchase the E8400 and overclock it, given the 45nm benefits and temperatures. If I didn't want to overclock a chip so far, I'd stick with the Q6600 and just clock it to 3.0GHz, which still beats out a severely overclocked E8400.
I think the best idea for anyone right now is to just wait until Intel releases their desktop 45nm Quad-Cores, sometime this quarter.