Doomsday said:
liked the Extra games option! Can be very important in deciding b/w Ati or Nvidia!
That was something special for this article, because I didn't feel right in only sticking to our current fleet of titles. It's kind of sad, but some of our titles are just plain out of date. The reason it's sad is because it feels like I
just revamped the entire GPU suite. Here I am needing to do it again! At least there are games out there that can actually push our GPUs, though. Metro 2033 is an incredible example of this.
Unregistered said:
well when Ati released 5000 series I think they accomplished lot of goals with those cards, especially energy efficiency when comparing to 4000 series.
This impresses me a lot, too. There was a time when people were really worried about ATI, and of course AMD, but today, it's hard to not feel confident in the company. Of course, as we've seen with NVIDIA, it's truly difficult to predict the future. Hopefully ATI can keep it up, and NVIDIA get back on track.
looisboo said:
that gta4 part was the funniest.
I am not sure what part you are referring to?
zblackrider said:
They forgot to ask, who is willing to blow their budget on Hydro?
This leads me to another thought... does anyone out there have a simple way of calculating how much extra a card like the GTX 480 would cost when compared to the HD 5870? I can't even think off the top of my head what my power bill is each month, but I think I'd be safe to say that the extra 100W per month could very well tack on another $5 a month to your bill, if you game often. That seems minor, but that'd be $60 per year, instantly increasing the actual cost of the GPU.
zblackrider said:
Oh, I can't seem to comprehend why everyone feels compelled to compare the 480 to 5870. Two completely different paths.
Not entirely. NVIDIA still has a major focus on gaming. It's just that it ALSO has a major focus on GPU computation, whereas ATI doesn't. If ATI had a competitive product in the computational field as NVIDIA, you could bet it would be boasting about it just as much.
Unregistered said:
Actually, my Nvidia GTX 280 did (does) the exact same thing. When you plugged in the second monitor, the frequency will remain at 600MHz (whereas with one monitor it throttles down to 300 MHz).
Ugh, that's strange. I would have figured Nate would have noticed that before, given he sticks to a dual-monitor setup. Does your GPU also get
way hotter when using that configuration as well?
b1lk1 said:
I commend you on telling it like it is and am proud to be on staff on a site that truly cares more about making people aware of all things good and bad about a product. Great review!
Thanks a lot man, I really appreciate the comment
I'm glad I'm not the only one who appreciates hard-hitting and accurate content. If we're going to publish content, we might as well do it right!