Techgage Benchmark Scoring Thread

[Greg King]

Here are our top ten lists for various popular benchmarks spanning GPU, CPU and memory synthetic tests. If you have a great score and want to be included in one of the top tens, just make a new post and add an attachment of the feat as proof. This will not only let us keep the thread updated with your latest runs, but also give other users an idea of what settings were used in the achieving of the scores. If needed, the included benchmarks can be downloaded from the links provided at the bottom of the page.

Thank you and good luck!

-------------

Video Card Benchmarks

When posting a score for a video card benchmark, be sure to include the exact card model and whether or not you are using a multi-GPU configuration.

Futuremark 3DMark Vantage

1. Empty Slot
2. Empty Slot
3. Empty Slot
4. Empty Slot
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

Futuremark 3DMark 2006

1. Rob - 20,591 (8800 GTS 512 SLI, Intel C2E QX9775 x 2 @ 4.0GHz)
2. Merlin - 17,715 (8800 GT SLI, Intel E8400 @ 4.0GHz)
3. bl1k1 - 14,851 (8800 GTS 512, Intel QX9650 @ 3.8GHz)
4. sbrehm - 14,149 (8800 GT, Intel E6750 @ 3.6GHz)
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot
11. Empty Slot

Lightsmark 2007 1.3

1. sbrehm - 448.6 (8800 GT, Intel E6750 @ 3.6GHz)
2. bl1k1 - 318.7 (8800 GTS 512, Intel QX9650 @ 3.8GHz)
3. Rob - 313.5 (8800 GTS 512 SLI, Intel C2E QX9775 x 2 @ 4.0GHz)
4. Merlin - 303.6 (8800 GT SLI, Intel E8400 @ 4.0GHz)
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

Processor Benchmarks

When submitting a score here, be sure to mention the CPU model and speed at which it's overclocked.

Cinebench R10 Multi-Thread

1. Rob - 29,008 (4.0GHz / Intel C2E QX9775 x 2)
2. Merlin - 7,866 (4.0GHz / Intel E8400)
3. Empty Slot
4. Empty Slot
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

SiSoftware SANDRA XII Arithmetic (Int/Float)

1. Rob - 109,391 / 104,463 (4.0GHz / Intel C2E QX9775 x 2)
2. Merlin - 33,023 / 28,323 (4.0GHz / Intel E8400)
3. Empty Slot
4. Empty Slot
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

SiSoftware SANDRA XII Multi-Media (MIPS/MFLOPS)

1. Rob - 1,011,291 / 547,036 (4.0GHz / Intel C2E QX9775 x 2)
2. Merlin - 250,824 / 116,381 (4.0GHz / Intel E8400)
3. Empty Slot
4. Empty Slot
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

SiSoftware SANDRA XII Memory Bandwidth (Int/Float)

1. Merlin - 8.00 / 8.01 (4.0GHz / Intel E8400)
2. Rob - 5.21 / 5.32 (4.0GHz / Intel C2E QX9775 x 2)
3. Empty Slot
4. Empty Slot
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

SuperPi 1.5 Mod 1 Million

1. Merlin - 12.521s (4.0GHz / Intel E8400)
2. sbrehm - 13.734s (3.6GHz / Intel E6750)
3. werty316 - 21.328s (3.0GHz / Intel E2140)
4. Empty Slot
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

SuperPi 1.5 Mod 32 Million

1. sbrehm - 14m 25.969s (3.6GHz / Intel E6750)
2. Merlin - 14m 48.494s (4.0GHz / Intel E8400)
3. Empty Slot
4. Empty Slot
5. Empty Slot
6. Empty Slot
7. Empty Slot
8. Empty Slot
9. Empty Slot
10. Empty Slot

Download Benchmarks

You can download the benchmarks we use here... but please don't hotlink.

Futuremark 3DMark 2006 1.10
Lightsmark 1.3
Cinebench R10
SiSoftware SANDRA XII 13.12 32-Bit
SuperPi 1.5 Mod

 

[Merlin]

FutureMark06 17715
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5865825

Lightsmark2007
302.7
SuperPi 1 mill 32 mill

 

[Merlin]

Cinebench

CINEBENCH R10
****************************************************
Tester :
Processor : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
MHz :
Number of CPUs : 2
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 6.0.6000
Graphics Card : GeForce 8800 GT/PCI/SSE2
Resolution : <fill out="" this="">
Color Depth : <fill out="" this="">
****************************************************
Rendering (Single CPU): 4080 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 7866 CB-CPU
Multiprocessor Speedup: 1.93
Shading (OpenGL Standard) : 6076 CB-GFX

****************************************************</fill></fill>

 

[Merlin]

Yeah....now you can tell me I did it wrong....LOL

Merlin :techgage:

 

[Rob Williams]

I have no idea about those SANDRA. There will be two results for each listed... ones an Integer result, while the other is floating-point.

I am going to bench soon and I'll upload the scores. I'll edit out that post since it's kind of long.

 

[Merlin]

I have no idea about those SANDRA. There will be two results for each listed... ones an Integer result, while the other is floating-point.

I am going to bench soon and I'll upload the scores. I'll edit out that post since it's kind of long.

That's Kewl

I wasn't sure

Merlin :techgage:

 

[sbrehm72255]

OK, lets get a few of mine up for my little ole system.

3D Mark 06 => 14,149

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4355944

 

[Merlin]

OK, lets get a few of mine up for my little ole system.

3D Mark 06 => 14,149

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4355944

How are you going to put up the SISoft scores?

 

[sbrehm72255]

Not sure yet, I really have run them in a long time, more than likely just take a screen shot of the results if I can. But I need to boot into Windows first to check it all out and run it a few time to be sure.

 

[Merlin]

SISoft scores

Arithmetic
Processor Bandwidth
Multimedia

Merlin

 

[werty316]

Looks like I'll have to do some quick benchmarking.

 

[Rob Williams]

I haven't had much time to overclock, so all I've done right now is the Skulltrail machine. I'll benchmark my regular machine as seen in my sig sometime this week. As for SANDRA, the results we need are the Int/Float (Multi-Media) and MIPS/MFLOPS (Arithmetic) from both... it will be displayed in that order in the results.

The results here are from an overclocked Skulltrail machine:

2 x QX9775 @ 4.0GHz
4GB FD-DIMM DDR2-800
2 x ASUS EN8800GTS 512 (780/1840)

 

[Rob Williams]

OK, lets get a few of mine up for my little ole system.

3D Mark 06 => 14,149

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4355944

Can you run that Lightsmark again? Your score is 50% higher than cards in SLI for some reason. I am just not sure if that's entirely accurate!

 

[sbrehm72255]

It might not like SLi or something, don't know, but I'll run mine again at stock GPU clocks just to see what I'm getting.

OK, just ran it again at LightsMark defaults (when the program starts) and at the system settings shown in the pic and I still come up with 448. A friend of mine gets about 50 FPS less on his AMD based system but running the same clocks on the card.

 

[Merlin]

It might not like SLi or something, don't know, but I'll run mine again at stock GPU clocks just to see what I'm getting.

OK, just ran it again at LightsMark defaults (when the program starts) and at the system settings shown in the pic and I still come up with 448. A friend of mine gets about 50 FPS less on his AMD based system but running the same clocks on the card.

We are not that far in CPU Mgz and FSB and you are killing me in FPS......maybe I'll take out one card and try that again, just on Lightsmark
Or maybe Lightsmark can't handle SLI ?
:techgage::techgage: Merlin :techgage::techgage:

 

[Merlin]

non SLI Tests

Well, that was disappointing
non SLI gave a little better score, but nothing like sbrehm's

:techgage::techgage: Merlin :techgage::techgage:

 

[sbrehm72255]

Or maybe Lightsmark can't handle SLI ?
:techgage::techgage: Merlin :techgage::techgage:

That's sort of what I'm thing, but I have no way to test it.................... Try disabling SLi instead of removing a card, that should work as well.

Strange, there has to be something in your settings that's holding your system back. What is your card clocked to??

May also have something to do with your drivers and OS that you're running, I'm running 169.21 drivers on XP with just about all services disabled.

 

[b1lk1]

Little 3D Mark 06 action

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5905977

Little over 14.8K running 3.8GHz on the CPU and 700/1025 on the video card.

I just ran Lightsmark too: just over 318

 

[Rob Williams]

I'm becoming increasingly confident that the blame is on Vista. Bill, Merlin and I are all using Vista and receive ~300 point scores, while sbrehm is uses XP and scores 50% higher.

If that's the case, then it's rather pointless to include it within our top ten. It's obvious that a single 8800 GT doesn't outperform SLI 8800 GTS 512 by 50%, and since we all don't run the same OS, competing there is nonsense.

I'll reboot this machine soon to XP and run the bench there to verify that this is indeed the case.

 

[sbrehm72255]

I agree that it's a Vista issue now after chatting with a few friends, they are all running XP with 8800 GT/GTS cards and are scoring 400 plus in the test.