Hey peeps,
Am I the only one who's depressed over notebook storage? Toshiba recently released a 200GB drive, which is the largest in the industry. But the sad fact is, the thing is not even -that- much faster than a super fast USB thumb drive.
I don't know about anyone else here, but I know I will never own a Raptor hard drive simply for the fact that they lack so much space. I could care less about performance in that regard if I have to try to cram all of the "important" stuff into 70GB or 150GB. The same goes for laptops really... how far does 200GB go nowadays? Not far at all, especially with all the digital collections we all have.
I am curious as to whether or not this situation will improve in the near future. Flash memory is in the works, and -may- allow higher capacities, but truth is it will be expensive as hell. 4GB thumb drive costs upwards of $70 alone. Imagine a flash notebook drive at 500GB! Of course prices are going down, but still. Even then, flash is not going to be fast compared to desktop drives.
I think a new standard is needed... perhaps 3.0" drives. With perpendicular magnetic recording, I can't see how those drives couldn't hold at least 500GB and still at least retain 7200RPM. 2.5" -really- takes away a lot of potential performance thanks to it being so small, but on the other hand, 3.0" would not be THAT much larger.
I know there are laptop providers out there who are on the ball though. Toshiba and Dell are now offering laptops with TWO of these small hard drives, most totalling to 320GB. Of course, these are still not that fast at 5400RPM, but it's certainly better than a dinky 160GB.
Thanks,
Anonymous luster for notebook storage
Ok so I am not anonymous.. whatever.
Am I the only one who's depressed over notebook storage? Toshiba recently released a 200GB drive, which is the largest in the industry. But the sad fact is, the thing is not even -that- much faster than a super fast USB thumb drive.
I don't know about anyone else here, but I know I will never own a Raptor hard drive simply for the fact that they lack so much space. I could care less about performance in that regard if I have to try to cram all of the "important" stuff into 70GB or 150GB. The same goes for laptops really... how far does 200GB go nowadays? Not far at all, especially with all the digital collections we all have.
I am curious as to whether or not this situation will improve in the near future. Flash memory is in the works, and -may- allow higher capacities, but truth is it will be expensive as hell. 4GB thumb drive costs upwards of $70 alone. Imagine a flash notebook drive at 500GB! Of course prices are going down, but still. Even then, flash is not going to be fast compared to desktop drives.
I think a new standard is needed... perhaps 3.0" drives. With perpendicular magnetic recording, I can't see how those drives couldn't hold at least 500GB and still at least retain 7200RPM. 2.5" -really- takes away a lot of potential performance thanks to it being so small, but on the other hand, 3.0" would not be THAT much larger.
I know there are laptop providers out there who are on the ball though. Toshiba and Dell are now offering laptops with TWO of these small hard drives, most totalling to 320GB. Of course, these are still not that fast at 5400RPM, but it's certainly better than a dinky 160GB.
Thanks,
Anonymous luster for notebook storage
Ok so I am not anonymous.. whatever.