Optix said:
While I respect Ubisoft for doing what they feel is the best way to protect their bottom line I don't like the method they chose.
That's true, and I agree. Any company has the right to protect their work, but as I mentioned, there's a right way, and a wrong way. I don't think anyone aside from Ubisoft in this case would disagree that the method it chose is the wrong way.
Brett Thomas said:
The problem with the "I'll just crack it" methodology is that nobody learns from it.
Yup, people will say, "I won't buy it because of the DRM, so I'll just pirate it", too, and that doesn't help a damned thing. It just means that the company will try even harder next time to make a more bullet-proof DRM solution, and what Ubisoft is doing here is a good example of what they'll come up with.
Can anyone else see the future of this? How about a requirement to scan your fingerprints in order to gain access? Or retina scanning?! Or needing to call up Ubisoft to type in a reactivation code because of a reformat? Think these sound outlandish? If you described Ubisoft's DRM before it was a reality, I probably would have thought the same thing.