Pixel size is another point to consider
Thanks for the great review. I specially liked the info about how lower the monitor can go. As it is the case for you, I also use my monitor as low as possible, because I am too close to it. Currently, I use a SyncMaster 213T and it can go as low as 4 inches above the surface, which is NOT good yet. I do have to look up to see the upper part of the screen.
So, having a big monitor that can go only down to 5 inches is not good at all. Of course one can try and find a support that would replace the original, but I don't think it would be easy. Ergotron makes nice supports but I don't think the LX model would be able to support such a big screen due to its weight. The model 200 series would, but then, it lacks height adjustment and we would be back to the same problem.
But the real reason I am writing this is to point out the importance of the size of the pixel. My current monitor, 213T, has a pixel of 0.27mm size. This 275T has a pixel 0.303mm. And the new 30" 305T - still to be released by Samsung - will have pixel size of 0.25 mm, as all other 30" monitor available (Dell and HP).
Since the LCD revolution started, companies have squeezed more and more pixels and bigger monitors making the letters and graphics smaller and smaller. When I changed from my 17" CRT to this 21" LCD, I felt the problem. Letters were smaller and my eye sight is not as good as it was when I was 20
.
So, when I heard of the 30" 2560x1600 pixel 305T model, by Samsung, I immediately knew that it wasn't a monitor for me, because the pixel size is even smaller than my current one (0,25mm versus 0,27mm). You may think this is a small difference, but considering that 0.27mm is already too small, 0,25mm is even worse, only good for those with eagle eyes, I think.
So, enters 27" 1920x1200 pixel 275T model. The resolution seems not to have increased so much compared to mine (1600x1200) but then there is the catch, the good one: pixel size has increased 12,2%, being 0.303 mm.
I expect this monitor to be awesome in terms of readability. It's very nice to know that companies decided to stop that decreasing-pixel-size war just to have big numbers to show off, like 2560x1600. It's better a smaller resolution that is more readable than the opposite, so I think.
I was thinking on buying the 275T but now, I am almost sure I will wait until I find some solution for its high minimum height. But I will definitely take a look at the Dell model. I am a Samsung nuts, I have begin using Samsung monitors for long, so, I am always afraid of trying other brands, specially because a monitor is bought to last years, so, if I make a mistake, I will regret for long.
Oh, and last but not least, I know I can change the dpi setting via software, like changing from 96 to 120. I have tried this alternative but it doesn't work well in practice as it looks in theory. It seems everything was made/prgrammed with the default DPI of 96 in mind, aka "normal size". Working with 120 dpi gets weird results.