Fifteen of the Worst PC Designs

Rob Williams

Editor-in-Chief
Staff member
Moderator
From our front-page news:
Throughout the long history of computing, many, many foolish mistakes have been made. When you first caught wind of one, the only appropriate response could have been, "What were they thinking?!", and a new article at the Technologizer takes a look at fifteen classic mistakes that we can hope will never reappear in the future. Just how bad can these mistakes be?

Well let me tell you... there's nothing minor here. Take the Apple III, for example. This business-oriented PC had a goal of quiet operation. How was that achieved? By removing the power supply fan! Needless to say, nobody was pleased with warped motherboards, or lackluster Apple II emulation. Then there's the Mattel Aquarius... a PC inside of a keyboard. Nothing new (at least back then), but what made it stand out were its rubber (yes, rubber) keys and built-in PSU adapter cable. Geez.

One of my favorites in the list has to be the IBM PCjr, a PC that offered unique expandability and also the world's first wireless keyboard (it can at least use that at its excuse). This box, using a vast array of proprietary connectors unique to this one machine, offered expandability via "sidecars"... clip-on components that made the machine wider. But the biggest problem was the wireless IR keyboard. Imagine using a wireless keyboard that required you to constantly keep a perfect angle and line-of-sight. Or the $20 add-on cable that turned it into a wired keyboard...

<table align="center" border="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td>
ibm_pcjr_061509.jpg

Credit: Steven Stengel</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Since the wireless feature on the keyboard turned out to be mostly useless, many users wished they had an old-fashioned, wired keyboard. Surely, one could just plug a regular IBM PC keyboard into the back of the machine and be done with it? Nope, sorry. The IBM PCjr used all non-standard accessory ports, including one for the keyboard. A cable to attach the chiclet keyboard directly to the computer was available for $20 by special order from IBM; it was not included with the system.


Source: Technologizer
 

2Tired2Tango

Tech Monkey
From our front-page news:
Throughout the long history of computing, many, many foolish mistakes have been made.​


Can I add one more that I was actually involved in... The Victor 9000...

This was an 8088 machine, on the market more than a year before IBM came out with their PC. This computer had the best monochrome monitor I've ever seen. One of the first "contactless" keyboards and it was a real joy to type on... man I could fly on that keyboard. The system also accomodated well beyond 640k of ram, 2.4 megs were possible with page switching. It had pixel graphics, it talked, had rudimentary sound card capability, and loaded it's MS-DOS os from floppies... and there was the mistake. Despite being faster, cheaper and more capable than the PC, they chose a proprietary floppy format.

The disks in this thing were amazing, 2.8megs on disks designed for 370k. The drive motors acutally changed speed on a track by track basis, letting them have more sectors on the outside track than on the inside. The whole thing was calculated to give absolutely uniform data density across the whole disk... and it worked.

But there was no way to switch gears and either load or write IBM disks. So when the It's Blue Mommy company came along with all their marketing power the first questions on our tech line were "Is it hardware compatible with IBM" and "Can it run IBM software"... no on both counts because of the floppies.

I was with Victor Canada at the time and worked almost exclusively on this machine as their national service supervisor for the computer line. As much as I liked the machine, I'm still stuck with "What exactly where they thinking?" when I think about what could have happened if only they'd stayed with standard floppies.​
 

Attachments

  • sirius_victor-s1_1.jpg
    sirius_victor-s1_1.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 403

Rob Williams

Editor-in-Chief
Staff member
Moderator
Ahh, sweet addition! You've been around the industry for a while, then. You gotta love how foolish these companies can be. To actually design a propriatary diskette just so people are locked into your product... dumb. I do gotta admit though... 2.8MB for a disk is amazing for the time-period we're dealing with. What could people have possibly needed that much storage for back then?
 

madstork91

The One, The Only...
Well rob, the internet is for po... Nevermind.

So who else isn't surprised that there are so many apples on the list?
 

2Tired2Tango

Tech Monkey
Ahh, sweet addition! You've been around the industry for a while, then. You gotta love how foolish these companies can be. To actually design a propriatary diskette just so people are locked into your product... dumb. I do gotta admit though... 2.8MB for a disk is amazing for the time-period we're dealing with. What could people have possibly needed that much storage for back then?

Actually the V-9000 was designed by Chuck Peddle of Atari fame. Based on the documentation at the time I think he actually expected people to jump on the bandwagon... He'd beat IBM to the 64k line by almost a year and probably didn't anticipate the marketing clout he was up against... a tactical error if not a technical one.
 

Altrus

Coastermaker
Just WOW...to the Coleco ADAM.....
Not only can't you turn it on without the printer but it emits a "strong" electromagnetic pulse when turned on....wow....

Also, I find the Texas Instruments TI-99/4A hilarious, with all those expansions coming off the side of it, it wouldn't even fit on my computer desk today.

When they say "strong" how strong is that?
 

Rob Williams

Editor-in-Chief
Staff member
Moderator
Yeah, it's been a few days... that's for sure.

Whoa! Now that's old-school, haha. You were ahead of the curve, that's for sure. Home PCs didn't begin to catch on until what, like ten years later? It wasn't until the 90's when things exploded.
 
Top