Cuil Off to Rough Start, Considered Laym by Most

Rob Williams

Editor-in-Chief
Staff member
Moderator
From our front-page news:
Alright, so I'm not the biggest fan of Google to begin with, but what's up with the immediate "Watch out Google!" statements whenever a new search engine rolls around? I think it's obvious that Google would have to have really serious competition before they would even spend a moment to remotely care. Where Cuil is concerned, I think the only emotion Google would express at this point is joy.

Cuil (pronounced 'cool', hence the foolish news title) came out just the other day, touting itself as the 'world's biggest search engine'. That I might believe, but in order for something like that to matter, a search engine also needs to deliver relevant results, one area where Cuil fails. Some queries to deliver reasonable results, but 'Techgage' shows our Cedega 6.0 article first... before the actual home page. That article performed well when first published, but still ranks under our top 300... so the fact that it shows up first is a little odd.

Searching for 'Cuil' delivers even more humorous results, as it nowhere lists its own site. It does appear, though, that the more popular a website, the better the chance that it will be listed first. Test out 'Yahoo!', 'Google', 'Intel' or 'UEFA', for example. Overall though, I do like the goals and design of the site, but it certainly seems to have a ways to go before it's taken seriously.

cuil_search_engine_072908.jpg

The Internet has grown exponentially in the last fifteen years but search engines have not kept up-until now. Cuil searches more pages on the Web than anyone else-three times as many as Google and ten times as many as Microsoft. Rather than rely on superficial popularity metrics, Cuil searches for and ranks pages based on their content and relevance.


Source: Cuil
 

Kougar

Techgage Staff
Staff member
You should have seen Ars Technica's post on Cuil. They searched for their own website using "Ars Technica", no quotes. They got zero results. Cuil later fixed it.

I ran a search for "HD 4850 fanspeed control" or some such, without quotes... Cuil returned a single result to Toms Hardware that was a news story. Google's very first link was the link to the fanspeed article I was looking for that explains the xml file editing.

Cuil has some major issues with keyword choices... and while they always fix the issue later (I think the software learns, because it is ALWAYS fixed after the fact), fixing it afterwards is to late. Cuil especially has problems with phrases.
 

Rob Williams

Editor-in-Chief
Staff member
Moderator
Didn't see that post, but I can imagine their response. After the post I made, I began to realize that it was even worse than what I made it out to be. Search for me, for example, 'Rob Williams'. You'll see many results, none of which are me, of course, but some of the results on the front page will show images taken DIRECTLY from the website... even though the actual results themselves have absolutely nothing to do with the image.

You have to wonder if they even tested their own product out before launching it to the public.
 
Top