Happy 1234567890!

Rob Williams · 02-13-2009, 06:31 PM

Unix-based operating systems may allow users to check for the system time in a human-readable format, but deep-down, its clock is relatively simple. The Unix internal clock officially began at midnight on January 1, 1970. Since that date, it's been on a quest to reach 1234567890, and yes, that number literally represents 1,234,567,890 seconds. In other words, ~14,288.9 days or ~39.148 years.

If you took the starting date of Unix time (January 1, 1970) and added 1,234,567,890 seconds to it, your result would be February 13, 2009, 23h:31m:30s UTC. For those curious, here's how it looked at that exact moment, when checking for it in a Unix command line:

rwilliams@techgage ~ $ date ; date +%s
Fri Feb 13 19:31:30 AST 2009
1234567890

Although it's hidden in the background, our forum software also stores threads and posts based on Unix time, and for fun, I made sure that this particular post was published at exactly 1234567890, server time (CST).

Happy 1234567890!

Merlin · 02-13-2009, 09:26 PM

Yee Haaaw, Break out the Beer
( I now know Rob has Beer )

Rob Williams · 02-14-2009, 01:00 PM

Haha. Strangely enough, I don't have any liquor at the house right now. That might change before the day is through, though!

On_Wisconsin · 02-14-2009, 05:07 PM

Hmm..is that why I've seen some files on a computer that were created on Jan 1st 1970 (when the computer is under a decade old?)

Rob Williams · 02-14-2009, 07:54 PM

To be honest, the date you see shouldn't be January 1, 1970, because that's Unix-derived. I think Windows can base a preset date like that depending on when the OS was first installed, but I'm not really sure of the full story. Whereas Unix time began on January 1, 1970, Windows' epoch begins on January 1, 1601, so if you saw any "default" dates, it might be that.

There are two cool points to mention though. As I mentioned above, Unix's time is based on a "second" scale, whereas Windows' is based on a "millisecond" scale, which is much more detailed. Also, due to its implementation, Windows has a date-range of 01/01/1601 - AD 30,828, which I'm assuming is going to be plenty. Unix on the other hand, has a big issue to worry about in 2038, which will be similar to Y2K.

Because Unix's clock is based on a signed 32-bit integer, it will roll-over in the year 2038, January 19. Rather than simply reset to a common value, it will instead result in back-tracking to December 13, 1901.

Here's to hoping that most people have upgraded their machines and software by then ;-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem

02-13-2009, 06:31 PM	#1
Rob Williams Editor-in-Chief Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Atlantic Canada Posts: 13,231	Happy 1234567890! Unix-based operating systems may allow users to check for the system time in a human-readable format, but deep-down, its clock is relatively simple. The Unix internal clock officially began at midnight on January 1, 1970. Since that date, it's been on a quest to reach 1234567890, and yes, that number literally represents 1,234,567,890 seconds. In other words, ~14,288.9 days or ~39.148 years. If you took the starting date of Unix time (January 1, 1970) and added 1,234,567,890 seconds to it, your result would be February 13, 2009, 23h:31m:30s UTC. For those curious, here's how it looked at that exact moment, when checking for it in a Unix command line: rwilliams@techgage ~ $ date ; date +%s Fri Feb 13 19:31:30 AST 2009 1234567890 Although it's hidden in the background, our forum software also stores threads and posts based on Unix time, and for fun, I made sure that this particular post was published at exactly 1234567890, server time (CST). Happy 1234567890! Attached Thumbnails __________________ Intel Core i7-990X EE @ 3.43GHz, GIGABYTE X58A-UD5, Kingston 12GB DDR3-1333, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB SSD, WD VR 1TB, WD 2TB, Seagate 2TB, LG BD-ROM, ASUS DVD-RW, Corsair 1000HX, Corsair H60 Cooler Corsair 800D, Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Gentoo (KDE 4.10, 3.7 Kernel) "Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter <Toad772> I don't always drink alcohol, but when I do, I take it too far.

02-13-2009, 09:26 PM	#2
Merlin The Tech Wizard Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Lakeland, Fl Posts: 1,855	Yee Haaaw, Break out the Beer ( I now know Rob has Beer ) __________________ Win7 64 bit Intel i7 920 watercooled Asus P6X580 Premium mobo, GTX280 GPU watercooled Synology NAS 207 Network Server with 2 Hitachi Terabite drives LG NAS N2R1 with 2 ea 2 tb drives LINKSYS PLK300 Powerline Network Kit

02-14-2009, 01:00 PM	#3
Rob Williams Editor-in-Chief Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Atlantic Canada Posts: 13,231	Haha. Strangely enough, I don't have any liquor at the house right now. That might change before the day is through, though! __________________ Intel Core i7-990X EE @ 3.43GHz, GIGABYTE X58A-UD5, Kingston 12GB DDR3-1333, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB SSD, WD VR 1TB, WD 2TB, Seagate 2TB, LG BD-ROM, ASUS DVD-RW, Corsair 1000HX, Corsair H60 Cooler Corsair 800D, Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Gentoo (KDE 4.10, 3.7 Kernel) "Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter <Toad772> I don't always drink alcohol, but when I do, I take it too far.

02-14-2009, 05:07 PM	#4
On_Wisconsin Coastermaker Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 233	Hmm..is that why I've seen some files on a computer that were created on Jan 1st 1970 (when the computer is under a decade old?) __________________ ASUS VH242H Black 23.6" and Samsung 226BW dual monitor setup, Logitech x-540 speakers

02-14-2009, 07:54 PM	#5
Rob Williams Editor-in-Chief Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Atlantic Canada Posts: 13,231	To be honest, the date you see shouldn't be January 1, 1970, because that's Unix-derived. I think Windows can base a preset date like that depending on when the OS was first installed, but I'm not really sure of the full story. Whereas Unix time began on January 1, 1970, Windows' epoch begins on January 1, 1601, so if you saw any "default" dates, it might be that. There are two cool points to mention though. As I mentioned above, Unix's time is based on a "second" scale, whereas Windows' is based on a "millisecond" scale, which is much more detailed. Also, due to its implementation, Windows has a date-range of 01/01/1601 - AD 30,828, which I'm assuming is going to be plenty. Unix on the other hand, has a big issue to worry about in 2038, which will be similar to Y2K. Because Unix's clock is based on a signed 32-bit integer, it will roll-over in the year 2038, January 19. Rather than simply reset to a common value, it will instead result in back-tracking to December 13, 1901. Here's to hoping that most people have upgraded their machines and software by then ;-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem __________________ Intel Core i7-990X EE @ 3.43GHz, GIGABYTE X58A-UD5, Kingston 12GB DDR3-1333, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB SSD, WD VR 1TB, WD 2TB, Seagate 2TB, LG BD-ROM, ASUS DVD-RW, Corsair 1000HX, Corsair H60 Cooler Corsair 800D, Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Gentoo (KDE 4.10, 3.7 Kernel) "Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter <Toad772> I don't always drink alcohol, but when I do, I take it too far.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Happy New Years!!!!	b1lk1	Off Topic	2	01-01-2010 02:47 PM
Windows 7 - A Happy OS?	Rob Williams	General Software	6	09-11-2009 08:45 PM
My city is happy!	Rob Williams	Off Topic	3	01-17-2008 09:28 AM
Happy B-day Matt!!	Rob Williams	Off Topic	6	03-16-2006 10:02 PM
Happy B-Day to Orbit!	Rob Williams	Site and Forum Comments & Issues	5	10-13-2005 09:52 PM