Latest Forum Posts

Latest News Posts
Coming Soon!
Social
Go Back   Techgage.com > Archives > Reviews and Articles

Reviews and Articles Discussion for Techgage content is located here. Only staff can create topics, but everyone is welcome to post.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2008, 02:23 AM   #1
Rob Williams
Editor-in-Chief
 
Rob Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 13,349
Default IDF 08 SF: Intel Reveals More About Nehalem

Intel opened up about their Nehalem architecture at this summer's IDF, and while we are unable to talk about performance data, what we can talk about is of great interest. Read on as we take a brief look at Turbo Mode, HyperThreading, CPU and Memory overclocking, the triple-channel memory controller and much more.

You can read the full look here and discuss it here!
__________________
Intel Core i7-3960X, GIGABYTE G1.Assassin 2, Kingston 16GB DDR3-2133, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB SSD (OS, Apps), WD VR 1TB (Games), Corsair 1000HX, Corsair H70 Cooler
Corsair 800D, Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Gentoo (KDE 4.11. 3.12 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter
<Toad772> I don't always drink alcohol, but when I do, I take it too far.


Rob Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 06:27 AM   #2
Kougar
Techgage Staff
 
Kougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,653
Default

That wasn't your hand in the photos was it?

Quote:
Highly overclocked current-gen processors with the fastest memory on the market will not even reach what Nehalem is capable of... even with DDR3-1066 memory. So while the overall memory frequency is low (to what we are now used to), the intense performance gains negate any downside.
Hm this seems directed at someone... Partly what I was getting at is if we can find a way of mitigating this huge performance hit due to CAS 7 or CAS 8 1066MHz memory, then the performance should jump noticeably, even significantly in some scenarios.

It may just be a pet peeve of mine, but I can't stand not fully optimizing a system regardless of how fast it is, if I know a little tweaking here or changes there can make it faster still for almost nothing. I'll be happy once I can see some 1333Mhz CAS 5 or CAS 6 results compared to 1066MHz CAS 7, which is already "tight" since most kits are CAS 8 and CAS 9 at these speeds.

Quote:
Depending on certain factors (none of which we can state until we actually know Nehalem's limitations), all current DDR3 memory should work fine, as long as the rest of the system allows it, such as the QPI, or whatever limitation we might run into. DDR3-2000 has been found functional on a Nehalem rig, but it leads to the new quandary of whether or not it's even needed.
Very good to hear! And that is extremely impressive that despite being integrated into the CPU AND that there are now three of them, that Intel's memory controllers had no issues handling 2000Mhz DDR3 kit. Or at least I will assume the no issues part, I think 2200MHz is the current maximum for DDR3.

Quote:
Today's applications can't even seem to make use of available bandwidth seen on the high-end memory kits available today, so will Nehalem essentially kill what is known as high-end RAM?
Despite DDR2 memory clocking anywhere from 1066Mhz up to 1200MHz showing no tangible performance gains outside of synthetic memory bandwidth tests (compared to DDR2-800Mhz CAS 4), almost every typical enthusiast jumped on 1066MHz PC2-8500 kit or better. I quite agree with you that such high-end DDR3 will be equally unnecessary, but in my view I don't think that is going to stop any of the same enthusiasts from buying it regardless whether to brag, have a "good looking" spec sheet, to play with, or whatever their reasons are.

Last I heard DDR3 hit something around 2200MHz stable, I bet that a good many extreme clockers are going to be dieing to break 2400MHz on a Nehalem rig, and that it will probably happen before the end of this year if Nehalem's IMCs truly do not have any limitation with memory frequencies, or at least are par with their chipset IMCs.

I'll be happy with some ultra-low latency DDR3-1333 or 1600 kit though... amazing but I don't think I've seen any yet.
__________________
Core i7 4770k 4.2Ghz
Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Crucial Ballistix Sport LP 1600MHz 32GB
EVGA GTX 480 HydroCopper FTW
ASUS Xonar DX
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB | Windows 7 64-bit
Apogee XT + MCP655 & Thermochill Triple 140mm Radiator
Corsair AX1200 PSU | Cooler Master HAF-X


Last edited by Kougar; 08-20-2008 at 06:48 AM.
Kougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
None

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Reveals Future SSD Details at IDF; Launches SSD 710 Series Rob Williams Storage Devices and Memory 2 09-16-2011 03:45 AM
Intel Core i7-870 & i5-750 - Nehalem for the Mainstream Rob Williams Reviews and Articles 17 11-29-2010 09:34 AM
Intel's 32nm Clarkdale - Nehalem for Everyone Rob Williams Reviews and Articles 9 01-05-2010 02:37 PM
Intel Reveals Westmere 32nm Roadmap Rob Williams Reviews and Articles 7 02-11-2009 04:24 PM
Intel Penryn and Nehalem New Details Rob Williams Reviews and Articles 0 03-28-2007 04:29 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 AM.