Go Back   Techgage.com > Site HQ > Reviews and Articles

Reviews and Articles Discussion for Techgage content is located here. Only staff can create topics, but everyone is welcome to post.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2007, 10:15 PM   #1
Default Corsair Voyager GT 8GB

Corsair announced new flash media at this years CES and amongst their new product line-up is their Voyager GT. Though not a replacement for their original Voyager series, the GTs have one specific goal: performance.

You can read the full review here and discuss it here.
__________________

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz, ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, OCZ 8GB PC2-6400, EVGA GTX 285 1024MB
Seagate 500GB, 750GB & 1TB, Pioneer 22x ODD, Corsair 1000HX, Thermalright Ultra-120, CM Storm Sniper
Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Ultrasone PRO 750, Gentoo Linux (KDE 4.3.2, 2.6.31 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter

Profiles: Last.fm | Xbox Live | Steam
Rob Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 07:39 PM   #2
Default IO Performance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Williams View Post
[I]
You can read the full review here and discuss it here.
It would be really great to see the IO performance reviewed (pref database and web patterns) to see how the low access time of this SSD drive compares in that situation. I'm thinking Intel's IO meter - are you able to add those numbers to the review?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 04:31 PM   #3
Default OCZ

I have seen some great tests on the OCZ ATV 8GB flash drive, I'd love to see some comparisons with that
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 08:08 PM   #4
Default Beware of newer version

Just to publicize the fact that newer versions of the Voyager GT (with the first numbers of this code 07306002-0) are slower than what you read in past reviews. I called Corsair and they told me they put a cheaper chip controller on newer versions and that they could replace mine for a regular 16gb Voyager. I get 24/21 in HD Tach R/W. And in all others, more or less (Sandra XII, HD Tune, HD Bench...)

Too bad. It still writes fast though. I might keep mine. I've read that the MLC (Multi-layers) technology used in higher capacity drives is much slower.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 08:49 PM   #5
Default

As far as I'm aware (I didn't check), the newer versions retail for less than what they used to, which is why there are slower chips.

I could be wrong though, but you are right... the scores might not add up to what we saw when this review was published.
__________________

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz, ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, OCZ 8GB PC2-6400, EVGA GTX 285 1024MB
Seagate 500GB, 750GB & 1TB, Pioneer 22x ODD, Corsair 1000HX, Thermalright Ultra-120, CM Storm Sniper
Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Ultrasone PRO 750, Gentoo Linux (KDE 4.3.2, 2.6.31 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter

Profiles: Last.fm | Xbox Live | Steam
Rob Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Experience with Corsair RMA Digerati Memory 6 06-21-2009 03:16 PM
Corsair Cinema Krazy K General Discussion 7 11-10-2008 02:55 PM
Corsair Releases 64GB Voyager Flash Drive Rob Williams Memory 0 09-29-2008 05:23 PM
Corsair XMS2 Ram Merlin Memory 3 08-14-2007 12:07 AM
Corsair Voyager 4GB Thumb Drive Rob Williams Reviews and Articles 4 06-28-2006 01:09 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2009, Techgage Networks Inc.