Benchmarking High Scores

[Rob Williams]

Graphics Benchmarks

Aquamark 3 - Overall Score (GPU+CPU)

DarkSynergy - 190970

Merlin - 190085
Sbrehm72255 -189773
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot3D Mark '01 - Game Tests

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot3D Mark '03 - Game Tests

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot3D Mark '05 - Game Tests

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot3D Mark '06 - Game Tests

Merlin - 15930

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty SlotCPU/Memory Benchmarks

Super Pi 1.4 Mod - 1 Million

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty SlotEVEREST Memory READ

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty SlotEVEREST Memory WRITE

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty SlotEVEREST Memory Latency

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty SlotSANDRA Memory Bandwidth - Int/Float

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty SlotSANDRA CPU Arithmetic - ALU/FPU

Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty Slot
Empty SlotIf you have a score that you want on the scoreboard, posted a picture or link to proof of the score and it will be added as soon as possible.

Download Benchmarks

Aquamark (http://download.guru3d.com/aquamark3/)
EVEREST (http://lavalys.com/products/overview.php?pid=3&lang=en)
SANDRA (http://www.sisoftware.net/)
Super Pi 1.4 Mod (http://superpi.radeonx.com/)

[DarkSynergy]

Beautiful! I will link you to my scores when I get home from work. Looks good so far. Now we only need tp fill in those spots!

[Rob Williams]

Just post your scores here. You can even edit them in yourself if you want.

[Muddy]

Could you also post places to download the BenchMark?

[Rob Williams]

Done. Will add the 3D Marks when Futuremark's sites up.

[Blumen]

3dmark03. Stock, untweaked.
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/8364/3d03stock6ez.jpg

3dmark05. Stock, untweaked.
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/9953/3d05stock3mh.jpg

SuperPi mod 1.4 1M
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/82/superpi10x215222110xz.jpg

Sandra memory benches, stock.
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8106/sandrastockuntweaked5th.jpg

[Blumen]

Aquamark gaming settings.
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/6181/aquamark311x2009bo.jpg

3dmark03 overclocked. (Auto detect @ 416/1.12)

http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/1134/3d03autodetect4ov.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Everest Crucial Ballistix pc4000 @ 200mhz @ 2-2-2-11 (http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/4283/everest3cc.jpg)

[SgtSethiol]

here are my score from screenshots

http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/6391/3dm03112509562qh.th.jpg (http://img253.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3dm03112509562qh.jpg)

sorry about size, score is 15268

[SillySider03]

Edited.

[DarkSynergy]

I will have the scores updated ASAP when I get home from work this evening.

Thanks guys.

Keep pushing those systems and we will see how competative things can get!

[Jakal]

Just go ahead and put them there scores at the top!
http://photobucket.com/albums/c388/Jakal_Blu/Benchmarks/

But really.. I got my gig of patriot dual channel ram in and have the system stable at 2.1GHz just using fsb increases. My mb doesn't have anything other than that and ram timings. I seem to have PC1700 Ram to Everest for some reason..? Ph33r my 31337 pc.

l o l

Unfortunately I'm not able to use my better hard drive, an ide WD Caviar 80g. A few weeks ago windows didn't want to work and I picked up 10g so I could use windows and access my files. Now I'm stuck with a 5400Rpm 2mb ata-66, I think, and running an old Radeon 9200 128Mb video card. I couldn't even run 3dMark05. I don't think it would have mattered anyway seeing my score of a little over 1k in 3dMark03. :rolleyes:

[Blumen]

The reason why Everest is seeing your ram at that weird speed is because that's the speed that it's running at. It benches your ram in it's current configuration, which is not necessarily what it's running at, at that time.

What motherboard is it, anyway? Also, what's the specs on the ram?

I have a 2200+ kicking around, and at stock it's scoring 5.5k cpu points in aquamark3.

Overall score is pretty good for a 9200 though. Beats my old fx5200 score.

[Jakal]

It's a Shuttle Ak39N. I wanted to go with an Ak35 but got talked out of it. That was my first pc I built myself and wasn't as confident in my decisions then as I am now. The Ak35 offers a lot more in the way of overclocking. I got the Patriot Signature Line PC3200 2x512. The speeds are supposed to be 2-3-2-5 but when I set it to that my pc wouldn't post. So I set it to autodetect and it's giving me 2.5-3-3-6. I'm going to check up on the timings from other reviews at NewEgg. Some were saying the paperwork was wrong.

[madmat]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v474/madmat_2001/11620.jpg

[madmat]

A little tweakage netted 11921

[Jakal]

Ok core at 2.2 effectively, fsb and ram are synchronous. Definitely a big difference in performance overall. http://photobucket.com/albums/c388/Jakal_Blu/Oveclocked/

[madmat]

My '05 results with the big bombastic bastich...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v474/madmat_2001/05Results.jpg

[madmat]

And these are the AQ3 scores...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v474/madmat_2001/AQ3.jpg

[madmat]

And finally the '03 score...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v474/madmat_2001/03Results.jpg

[madmat]

I beat 98k in AQ3...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v474/madmat_2001/Pwnage.jpg

[Jakal]

That's niiiiiiice! Wish I had the 4 grand to do something like that :/ Oh well I'll start work on my new rig shortly :D Great scores man, any thoughts of overclocking it, albeit slightly, just to see what it can do?

[Rob Williams]

SOOO close to 100K!

[madmat]

It won't OC at all. I've been trying all day and anything above default settings for either the CPU or the ram and it either BSOD's or it hard locks.

Oh well, it's fast as hell at default settings as it is.

[madmat]

3DMark 06: 1902... :'( But, I am in the top 20 for my class...P4 with 6800NU

[Rob Williams]

That's not so bad man.

[madmat]

No, all the other guys surrounding me are running P4's at a minimum of 3.4ghz. I'd say that mine at 3.2 is actually doing pretty well all things considered.

[Blumen]

SillySider and i are trading back and forth for #1 in '06 for Socket A/6800nu.

My best so far, after a total of two runs is 2339. :P

I'll see if i can get the link up here in a bit. I've got some more catching up to do first though. :)

[madmat]

I'm at 2134 now...I need to disable HT and see if my score goes up.

[Rob Williams]

I gotta update the first post in this thread soon. :-/

[madmat]

Disabled HT and gained 150+ in the CPU score but for some reason I had to roll the core back to 385Mhz from 390...

In short the score is 2175 now.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=79480

[Blumen]

^Nice, you got me beat on all the cpu tests, but i haven't overclocked that yet.

That's pretty weird that no HT helped you though.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=49333

[madmat]

Not really, I noticed a trend on the P4's that the scores with no HT tended to be higher CPU wise and the scores with HT were lower. Now the 6XX series are the exception to this, they have the massive L2 cache though so that might have something to do with it.

[Jakal]

Aquamark and 3dMark01 scores @2.7. Dropped the Htt multiplier to 4x, 900Mhz effective.
http://i1.tinypic.com/mr94br.jpg
http://i1.tinypic.com/mr92ps.jpg

[Jakal]

<a href ="http://photobucket.com/albums/c388/Jakal_Blu/Benchmarks">Benchmarks</a>
Theres what I've gotten so far. Just keeping a record.

[madmat]

Very nice man, I'm jelly over those mem bandwidth scores :P

[Jakal]

<3 Amd lol. I've got the 7800GT at 495/1250. I think I can improve those scores once I get the sata hd. I'm running on a WD Caviar 80G at Ata-100. Will be stepping up to Sata shortly.

[Sledgehammer70]

I took the time to bench a few of my systems voia 3D mnark 2006...
Stock - FX57 with Dual 7800GTX 512's = 7,546
Stock - 4800 X2 7800GTX 256 = 6,480
Stock - 4400 X2 7800GT 256 = 4,787
Stock - FX55 7800GT's 256's = 5,385
Stock - A64 3700+ 7800GT = 3,145
Stock - A64 4000+ 6800GT = 2,810
Stock - A64 3000+ 6800Ultra = 2,720

http://www.mandmcr.com/online_images/Comp/comps1.jpg
http://www.mandmcr.com/online_images/Comp/comps2.jpg[/CENTER]

[werty316]

Holy crap you have alot of hardware and great hardware at that too. Heres my best 06 so far.

A64 @ 2.4GHz/2.3GHz
XFX 7800GTX @ STOCK

4031 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=82156)

8065 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1774497)

16907 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4586050)

[DarkSynergy]

Here is my latest Aquamark3 score...

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/517/101kbitch4ea.png

[RazorBack]

Nice score :D

Sledgehammer that's some array of rigs you got there... very nice! Must upload a few pictures of my set up again. New mouse and keyboard arrive today (see sig) :D

[DarkSynergy]

All right guys. This thread has kind of been brushed off as of late but I would like to revive it. From now on, I will be posting updated scores on this page to keep track of all of those high scores you all can submit.

Let's get it on!

[Rob Williams]

Brushed off is right. Lets get a move on!...

... Greg!

Once I get my "final" benchmarking machine up, I will start submitting scores again. I haven't been doing much benchmarking lately except for stuff I need to review.

I let this thread fail :(

[madmat]

I get my 7950GT today, I'm soooo stoked!! Expect to see my scores here ASAP, I most likely won't work on it until Thursday though, gotta werk tonight.

[madmat]

Here's the first go with the 3800+ and the 7950GT at stock with a fresh un-restarted vid card driver install. I couldn't wait. ;)

[madmat]

3DMark '03, 19,786.

[madmat]

3DMark '05, 9,653. Overall I'm fairly impressed.

[Rob Williams]

Great stuff man. Time to overclock'er ;-)

[madmat]

Actually that was slightly OC'ed. I've found that it errors when I try to get the Vram above 735mhz (1.47 according to the nV drivers) and it won't complete the test for the OC.

Doesn't look good for the MCWR after I migrate over to water. It's on air ATM.

[Rob Williams]

The 7950GT I had didn't like an overclocked mem clock either... I didn't go much beyond 775MHz. The core was great though, going up to 650MHz.

Maybe you will have better luck with your core. Regardless, you have good scores at stock. Right in line with what I was getting.

[Babrbarossa]

3dmark 06 10331
This was done with my e6400 at 3.2 GHz- I now run it at 3.4 but unfortunately my copy of 3dmark has since become corrupted and with with very slow dial-up I can't re-download it to try it again.

using e6400, 8800gtx, evga680i, ocz gold 800mhz, ocz gamexstream 700w, arctic cooling freezer pro7

[Naish]

I need to work on mine a bit, I'll be posting an idiot-thread in a few minutes. Here's my score :).

(3.2ghz, ignore coretemp, it's because the volts are on auto I'm assuming, temps are fantastic though)

[sbrehm72255]

Just a little something I've been messing with the past few days.

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/2232/3dm062tx0.jpg

Not to bad for a $250 card..................;)

[Rob Williams]

I think I might unstick this thread and let it die... and then perhaps work towards making a new thread with similar ideas, but actually keep it up to date.

Anyone have any thoughts on this? Or better ideas?

[Merlin]

Just a little OC @ 3.377
http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=5070435&compareResultType=14

( by the way, that was compared to a skulltrail ( not the highest score ))
Merlin

[Merlin]

http://service.futuremark.com/results/showSingleResult.action?resultId=5545163&resultType=14

okay...gotta get some rest....

[sbrehm72255]

Upped mine just a little.......;) Still only running a single 8800GT.

14149
3DMarks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4355944

[Rob Williams]

Alright, it seems like there is a little support left for this, so I might recreate sometime soon and include 3D Mark 06 and also Sandra. Is there anything else that should be included?

I'll include scores from my beasts, even though it's a little unfair, but it will kick things off. I'll hopefully get on testing my own stuff in the coming days and then will merge some scores over.

Would anyone on staff or forum regular be interested in managing a thread like this?

[Merlin]

Upped mine just a little.......;) Still only running a single 8800GT.

14149
3DMarks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4355944
478 FSB....not bad
I'm trying to get mine up.....still new at this

Merlin

[Merlin]

Alright, it seems like there is a little support left for this, so I might recreate sometime soon and include 3D Mark 06 and also Sandra. Is there anything else that should be included?

I'll include scores from my beasts, even though it's a little unfair, but it will kick things off. I'll hopefully get on testing my own stuff in the coming days and then will merge some scores over.

Would anyone on staff or forum regular be interested in managing a thread like this?
What would you have to do to manage?
I'm still green at overclocking....lol
I do searches on google and see threads from other forums, so maybe a thread like this would bring more members to techgage forums.

Merlin

[sbrehm72255]

478 FSB....not bad
I'm trying to get mine up.....still new at this

Merlin

That's about the limit on my core..............:( I was unlucky enough to get one from the batch that has the nasty FSB wall.

This is exactly why I'm looking to get either a Yorkfield or Wolfdale when I get the cash saved.

[Rob Williams]

What would you have to do to manage?

Editing the scores and the like, whenever someone submits a new score.

I might submit a score for both the Skulltrail and the main machine I'm using for Linux when I can find the time though.

[DarkSynergy]

Would anyone on staff or forum regular be interested in managing a thread like this?


Count me in. I can update it in my down time at work. There was such a lack of participation that it fell to the wayside but if we can gather interest, I would be happy to update the lists on a daily basis.

B1lk1, do you have any suggestions? Perhaps ideas that you learned from the AQM4 boards?

[Merlin]

<TABLE class=resulttable><TBODY><TR><TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DisplayWidth: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>1024 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=768 name=Run0_DisplayHeight> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>DisplayHeight: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>768 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=32 name=Run0_DisplayDepth> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DisplayDepth: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>32 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Run0_AntialiasingMode> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AntialiasingMode: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Run0_AntialiasingQuality> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AntialiasingQuality: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=4 name=Run0_AnisotropicFiltering> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AnisotropicFiltering: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>4 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=4 name=Run0_DetailLevel> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DetailLevel: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>4 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=177.163071 name=Run0_AvgFPS> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AvgFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>177.163071 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=98.619308 name=Run0_MinFPS> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MinFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>98.619308 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=277.120331 name=Run0_MaxFPS> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>MaxFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>277.120331 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=355.240509 name=Run0_AvgFPSRender> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AvgFPSRender: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>355.240509 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=353.604004 name=Run0_AvgFPSSimulation> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AvgFPSSimulation: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>353.604004 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=53331780 name=Run0_AvgTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AvgTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>53331780 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=6656626 name=Run0_MinTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>MinTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>6656626 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=215902803 name=Run0_MaxTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MaxTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>215902803 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=35523 name=Run0_AquamarkScoreRender> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AquamarkScoreRender: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>35523 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=17680 name=Run0_AquamarkScoreSimulation> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AquamarkScoreSimulation: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>17680 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=177163 name=Run0_AquamarkScore> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AquamarkScore: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>177163 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

[sbrehm72255]

DisplayWidth: 1024
DisplayHeight: 768
DisplayDepth: 32
AntialiasingMode: 0
AntialiasingQuality: 0
AnisotropicFiltering: 4
DetailLevel: 4
AvgFPS: 179.743866
MinFPS: 125.000000
MaxFPS: 269.000000
AvgFPSRender: 349.465576
AvgFPSSimulation: 370.200378
AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 54108684
MinTrianglesPerSecond: 6823480
MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 206499562
AquamarkScoreRender: 34947
AquamarkScoreSimulation: 18511
AquamarkScore: 179743

[Merlin]

<TABLE class=resulttable><TBODY><TR class=bgcolordark><TD width=240 colSpan=2> General: </TD><TD width=340></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value="Benchmark 2008-03-17 19-34-45" name=General_Name> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Name: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>Benchmark 2008-03-17 19-34-45 </TD></TR><TR height=32><TD height=32></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=resulttable><TBODY><TR class=bgcolordark><TD width=240 colSpan=2> Processor: </TD><TD width=340></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=GenuineIntel name=Processor_Vendor> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Vendor: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>GenuineIntel </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value="Pentium(R) III processor" name=Processor_Name> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>Name: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>Pentium(R) III processor </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=3403 name=Processor_SpeedMHz> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>SpeedMHz: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>3403 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Processor_Type> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>Type: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=6 name=Processor_Family> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Family: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>6 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=7 name=Processor_Model> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>Model: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>7 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=6 name=Processor_Stepping> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Stepping: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>6 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0xBFEBFBFF name=Processor_Flags> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>Flags: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>0xBFEBFBFF </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=2 name=Processor_Number> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Number: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>2 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=n/a name=Processor_HyperThreading> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>HyperThreading: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>n/a </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=2145320960 name=Processor_MemoryOS> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MemoryOS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>2145320960 </TD></TR><TR height=32><TD height=32></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=resulttable><TBODY><TR class=bgcolordark><TD width=240 colSpan=2> Graphics: </TD><TD width=340></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value="NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT" name=Graphics_Description> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Description: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=4318 name=Graphics_Vendor> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>Vendor: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>4318 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=1553 name=Graphics_Device> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Device: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>1553 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=3355588674 name=Graphics_SubSys> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>SubSys: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>3355588674 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=162 name=Graphics_Revision> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Revision: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>162 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Graphics_CoreClock> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>CoreClock: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Graphics_MemoryClock> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MemoryClock: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=nvd3dum.dll name=Graphics_Driver> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>Driver: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>nvd3dum.dll </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=7.15.11.6925 name=Graphics_DriverVersion> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DriverVersion: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>7.15.11.6925 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=1311768576 name=Graphics_VideoMemory> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>VideoMemory: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>1311768576 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=1299185664 name=Graphics_TextureMemory> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>TextureMemory: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>1299185664 </TD></TR><TR height=32><TD height=32></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=resulttable><TBODY><TR class=bgcolordark><TD width=240 colSpan=2> OperatingSystem: </TD><TD width=340></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden name=OperatingSystem_Version> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Version: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden name=OperatingSystem_Type> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>Type: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=6000 name=OperatingSystem_Build> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>Build: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>6000 </TD></TR><TR height=32><TD height=32></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=resulttable><TBODY><TR class=bgcolordark><TD width=240 colSpan=2> Run0: </TD><TD width=340></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=1024 name=Run0_DisplayWidth> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DisplayWidth: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>1024 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=768 name=Run0_DisplayHeight> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>DisplayHeight: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>768 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=32 name=Run0_DisplayDepth> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DisplayDepth: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>32 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Run0_AntialiasingMode> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AntialiasingMode: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Run0_AntialiasingQuality> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AntialiasingQuality: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=4 name=Run0_AnisotropicFiltering> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AnisotropicFiltering: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>4 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=4 name=Run0_DetailLevel> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DetailLevel: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>4 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=180.329010 name=Run0_AvgFPS> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AvgFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>180.329010 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=107.495079 name=Run0_MinFPS> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MinFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>107.495079 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=273.175568 name=Run0_MaxFPS> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>MaxFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>273.175568 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=362.816376 name=Run0_AvgFPSRender> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AvgFPSRender: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>362.816376 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=358.492615 name=Run0_AvgFPSSimulation> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AvgFPSSimulation: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>358.492615 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=54284828 name=Run0_AvgTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AvgTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>54284828 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=6773113 name=Run0_MinTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>MinTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>6773113 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=210880158 name=Run0_MaxTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MaxTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>210880158 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=36282 name=Run0_AquamarkScoreRender> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AquamarkScoreRender: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>36282 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=17925 name=Run0_AquamarkScoreSimulation> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AquamarkScoreSimulation: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>17925 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=180329 name=Run0_AquamarkScore> <TD width=40> </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AquamarkScore: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>180329 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

[Merlin]

Best So Far at 3.4 GHz oc

[b1lk1]

Count me in. I can update it in my down time at work. There was such a lack of participation that it fell to the wayside but if we can gather interest, I would be happy to update the lists on a daily basis.

B1lk1, do you have any suggestions? Perhaps ideas that you learned from the AQM4 boards?




We used HWBOT on AQM4 forums, although the HWBOT is a pain in the ass sometimes. I am pretty sure it works with V-Bulletin better than the IPB software AQM4 runs. If you want, I can set up a Techgage HWBOT team easy enough.

[Rob Williams]

OK, it's on. With Greg's help, we can keep this thing up to date. I'll create a new thread tomorrow. I think we'll include 3DMark 06 overall score and SiSoftware SANDRA Multi-Media and Arithmetic.

Any suggestions?

At first, I'll throw in my scores, though a little unfair, but it will help kick things off.

[DarkSynergy]

We used HWBOT on AQM4 forums, although the HWBOT is a pain in the ass sometimes. I am pretty sure it works with V-Bulletin better than the IPB software AQM4 runs. If you want, I can set up a Techgage HWBOT team easy enough.

I knew you were the man to talk to about this. Perhaps we can get a few from the AQM site to post some scores here as well... spur a little competition.

[DarkSynergy]

OK, it's on. With Greg's help, we can keep this thing up to date. I'll create a new thread tomorrow. I think we'll include 3DMark 06 overall score and SiSoftware SANDRA Multi-Media and Arithmetic.

Any suggestions?

At first, I'll throw in my scores, though a little unfair, but it will help kick things off.

Instead of posting your scores with that Skulltrail, why don't you just use MS-PAINT, or whatever generic open source version Gentoo comes with, and draw us all bending over and your scores giving us the business. :eek:

That said, I am excited for more scores. Competition, and fair competition at that, will bring more people to the forums. It can only help IMO.

[sbrehm72255]

1 last AquaMark now that the major thunder storms are past and I'm able to get back online again...........;)

Name: Benchmark 2008-03-17 23-38-30

Processor:
Vendor: GenuineIntel
Name: Unknown processor
SpeedMHz: 3599
Type: 0
Family: 6
Model: 15
Stepping: 3
Flags: 0xBFEBFBFF
Number: 2
HyperThreading: n/a
MemoryOS: 2146676736

Graphics:
Description: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Vendor: 4318
Device: 1553
SubSys: 115087857
Revision: 162
CoreClock: 0
MemoryClock: 0
Driver: nv4_disp.dll
DriverVersion: 6.14.11.6921
VideoMemory: 531628032
TextureMemory: 778043392

OperatingSystem:
Version: Microsoft Windows XP
Type:
Build: Service Pack 2 2600

Run0:
DisplayWidth: 1024
DisplayHeight: 768
DisplayDepth: 32
AntialiasingMode: 0
AntialiasingQuality: 0
AnisotropicFiltering: 4
DetailLevel: 4
AvgFPS: 189.773315
MinFPS: 95.000000
MaxFPS: 285.000000
AvgFPSRender: 371.614990
AvgFPSSimulation: 387.730713
AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 57127868
MinTrianglesPerSecond: 8048146
MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 223402765
AquamarkScoreRender: 37161
AquamarkScoreSimulation: 19387
AquamarkScore: 189773

[THUMPer]

Where we at on the new Thread? I have some numbers i want to throw up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[sbrehm72255]

Just toss them up here and copy/paste them to the new forum later when they get everything all set up.............;)

[Rob Williams]

Looks like I'll throw this up tomorrow or late tonight. We'll see. Keep the scores written down ;-)

[sbrehm72255]

I've got most of my results saved (somewhere) and those that I don't (or can't locate again) can be redone easy enough...........;)

[sbrehm72255]

You might want to change SuperPi to mod 1.5 and then there's a new lightsMark benchmark out that's pretty interesting that you might want to add.
http://dee.cz/lightsmark/

Natural lighting makes artificial graphics life-like. Computers get faster, but rendering more polygons doesn't add value if lighting looks faked, so insiders know that the next big thing is proper lighting aka Realtime Global Illumination. Typical workloads in realtime rendering will shift. Lightsmark simulates it. Global Illumination renders often take hours. Is your computer fast enough for realtime?

Before Lightsmark, realtime global illumination was limited to small scenes, small resolutions, small speeds, specially crafted scenes with handmade optimizations. Lightsmark breaks all limits at once, running in reasonably sized scene (220000 triangles) in high resolution (1680x1050) at excellent speed (100-400fps). Lighting is computed fully automatically in original unmodified scene from 2007 game World of Padman, not tweaked for Lightsmark and with all sorts of geometrical difficulties, with extra rooms hidden below floor etc.

[sbrehm72255]

3D Mark 06 = 14,149, single 8800GT............:D

Lights Mark = 483 default screen size of 1280 x 1024

[Rob Williams]

I'll check out that Lightsmark tomorrow sometime. I'd rather not include SuperPi as it's rather useless. It's a single-threaded application and in no way shows off the strength of a system. In addition, it's not that optimized... and it actually takes longer to compute Pi than others do.

Right now we'd like to include:

Futuremark 3DMark 06
SiSoftware SANDRA XI Arithmetic
SiSoftware SANDRA XI Multi-Media
Cinebench R10

Thoughts?

[sbrehm72255]

I guess I'm going to go and find SANDRA XI, Don't think I have that version...............:(

[Rob Williams]

Err, I meant XII, my bad.

http://www.sisoftware.co.uk/index.html?dir=dload&location=sware_dl_all&langx=en&a=

We'd upgrade it with each new major version.

[THUMPer]

ya anything but aquamark. no one uses that anymore.

[DarkSynergy]

Piss off! Aquamark is the single best benchmark ever. It might actually save humanity. That or I just want to include it to justify the countless nights it's stolen from me.

[THUMPer]

I agree with Super PI. I got 17 seconds on my gaming machine, and 23 seconds on my Dual CPU Xeon Server. I don't get that at all. Must be purely CPU speed determined.

[sbrehm72255]

I agree with Super PI. I got 17 seconds on my gaming machine, and 23 seconds on my Dual CPU Xeon Server. I don't get that at all. Must be purely CPU speed determined.

CPU and memory..............;)

I like messing with SuperPi myself. It takes a ton of tuning to get your times down.

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/4559/e675037superpiwt0.jpg

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/6934/sp13610qn1.jpg

[Rob Williams]

SuperPi is just incredibly single-threaded, so having a higher score doesn't mean much. BUT, if single-core frequency is what we are going for, then it could be included.

SuperPi just doesn't do much for me. It was far cooler back when single and dual-cores were king, but with the advent of Quad-Cores, it's lost it's appeal. For example, a 3.5GHz OC'd E6600 would beat out a 3.0GHz QX9650, despite them being on an entirely different level, and that's what I find odd.

If you all think we should include it... then we can. I do think it should be the 32Mil test only though... the others complete far too quick.

[sbrehm72255]

Some sites do 1 meg while others do 32 meg, guess it really doesn't matter.

You're right about the difference in single/dual cores against Quads, I guess I still like it because I still run a dual core.............;)

We can pass on it if you like, it was just a suggestion.........:)

I'm easy that way.

[Merlin]

Is there a comparison website?

Merlin

[sbrehm72255]

Not that I'm aware of, but I haven gone completely through their site either.

[Merlin]

Finally figured out to OC the FSB and reran the LightsMark video test CPU @ 37C

Merlin :techgage:

[sbrehm72255]

Good to hear, you're making progress.........;)

[Merlin]

WOW...went up to 16460 from 15557 ( first score )

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5830095

Merlin

[sbrehm72255]

Cool, now push those cores a bit harder, you shouldn't have to many more problems...............;)

Make sure that you disable all the un-needed junk in the bios aswell, that help make it more stable...............;)

CPU Thermal Control
C1E Enhance Halt State
Intel Speedstep

CPU Spread Spectrum to Disable
HT Spread Spectrum to Disable
PCIe Spread Spectrum(SPP) to Disable
PCIe Spread Spectrum(MCP) to Disable
SATA Spread Spectrum to Disable

This link is for 680i OC'ing, but seeing as the 680i and 780i are basicly the same chip set, there should be some pretty good info in there for you to go by..............:D

http://www.nvidia.com/docs/CP/45121/nforce_680i_sli_overclocking.pdf

[Merlin]

Temps are coming up a bit...but still not bad at 43C

I'll let it stay here for a while to see hom programs run

Merlin

[Merlin]

438 is about it at stable
CPU @ 3.9xxx

[Merlin]

<TABLE class=resulttable><TBODY><TR class=bgcolordark><TD width=240 colSpan=2>Run0: </TD><TD width=340></TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=1024 name=Run0_DisplayWidth> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DisplayWidth: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>1024 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=768 name=Run0_DisplayHeight> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>DisplayHeight: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>768 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=32 name=Run0_DisplayDepth> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DisplayDepth: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>32 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Run0_AntialiasingMode> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AntialiasingMode: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=0 name=Run0_AntialiasingQuality> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AntialiasingQuality: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>0 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=4 name=Run0_AnisotropicFiltering> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AnisotropicFiltering: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>4 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=4 name=Run0_DetailLevel> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>DetailLevel: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>4 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=190.085052 name=Run0_AvgFPS> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AvgFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>190.085052 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=128.205139 name=Run0_MinFPS> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MinFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>128.205139 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=292.899384 name=Run0_MaxFPS> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>MaxFPS: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>292.899384 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=382.475159 name=Run0_AvgFPSRender> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AvgFPSRender: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>382.475159 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=377.807251 name=Run0_AvgFPSSimulation> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AvgFPSSimulation: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>377.807251 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=57221712 name=Run0_AvgTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AvgTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>57221712 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=6499438 name=Run0_MinTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>MinTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>6499438 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=233157778 name=Run0_MaxTrianglesPerSecond> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>MaxTrianglesPerSecond: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>233157778 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=38247 name=Run0_AquamarkScoreRender> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AquamarkScoreRender: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>38247 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=18890 name=Run0_AquamarkScoreSimulation> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=200>AquamarkScoreSimulation: </TD><TD class=bgcolorlight width=300>18890 </TD></TR><TR><INPUT type=hidden value=190085 name=Run0_AquamarkScore> <TD width=40></TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=200>AquamarkScore: </TD><TD class=bgcolorwhite width=300>190085 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

[sbrehm72255]

3.95 GHz at 1.368v is pretty darn sweet, with better cooling (water) I could hit 4.5 GHz I think................;)

[Rob Williams]

Hmm, smells like someone just got egg'd on. Go for broke Merlin ;-)

[Merlin]

Not that I'm aware of, but I haven gone completely through their site either.
:( Some are hitting 500.2
And then someone said something about cheating the scores.
Why the hell would you cheat the scores??
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?p=527769


Merlin :techgage:

[sbrehm72255]

There's always going to be those that are going to cheat at everything just to make themselves look bigger or better than everyone else. I don't understand it myself either, but whatever blows their skirt up as they say...........;)

[Rob Williams]

Don't worry about the cheaters... they only do it to make themselves feel better since they've never had sex with a woman.

That's my theory, anyway.